Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 January 13

The result of the debate was delete. —Centrx→talk • 05:56, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The functionality in these two userboxes has been merged into one. Template:User vigil-n is now a redirect to User:UBX/vigil and now that all transclusions have been updated, this redirect is no longer needed. If interested, please see also discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scouting. Thank you. --BigDT 18:51, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was: converted to a disambiguation page, no longer a redirect. Dar-Ape 18:00, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I want to disambiguate "Panax" as either Ginseng or a minor character from a popular fantasy series, The Voyage of the Jerle Shannara. Thus, is there a way someone could delete the redirect so that I can disambiguate?--Shoemaukertuvvick 14:42, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted – Gurch 05:40, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's doubtful that this particular school is universally considered to be the best school in New South Wales. --- RockMFR 03:47, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

speedy delete if a redirect can be speedily deleted. DGG 05:29, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - clearly POV Orderinchaos78 07:39, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. POV. It's isn't an alternative name of the school or anything like that, and therefore doesn't qualify as a valid redirect. Michaelas10 (Talk) 11:07, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
'Speedy delete - Nobodys going to type that Kamope | userpage | talk | contributions 13:16, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete vandalism. JuJube 00:53, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I am quite certain there is someone out there that would disagree with the target of the redirect, as what the qualifier best refers to is POV in and of itself, at least in this context. Additionally, it doesn't fall under any of the usage examples given under the redirect guideline, and seems to also fall under condition four of when a redirect should be deleted. Kyra_~(talk) 02:09, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was delete. —Centrx→talk • 05:55, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-namespace redirect pointing out of article space. Additionally, WP:Unprotect already exists. Kyra_~(talk) 14:36, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anything suitable to change the redirect to? 68.39.174.238 19:26, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not a good use for cross-namespace redirection. Kusma (討論) 10:01, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Deleye per Kusma Kamope | userpage | talk | contributions 13:15, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Contents